Friday, January 11, 2013

Albania – IMF issues staff report for country, giving banking system high marks for liquidity and solvency but warning of dangers from continued rise in non-performing loans


On 11 January 2013 the International Monetary Fund issued a series of documents regarding Albania, including a 58-page staff report (dated 16 November 2012) entitled “Staff Report for the 2012 Article IV Consultation.”  Below are two unedited excerpts from the staff report that deal with the banking system.  (Emphasis as per original.)


[…]

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: EUROZONE CRISIS TAKING A TOLL

C. Banking System: Stability Amidst Continued Risks
8. The banking system has been resilient so far, but domestic and external spillover risks are concerns (Figure 4). Unlike many regional countries, Albania did not experience a big boombust credit cycle, in large part because of prudent limits on external borrowing prior to the crisis. Banks today exhibit high liquidity and solvency ratios (Table 5), supported by continued stringent liquidity and capital requirements. Nonetheless, NPLs have risen sharply over the last two years and now exceed one fifth of all outstanding loans, the highest ratio in SEE (80 percent of NPLs are in the corporate sector—largely in trade, construction and manufacturing). Further, a large pool of “watch loans”—representing the leading edge of possible new NPLs—could add another 5–10 percentage points down the road. Provisioning has been adequate, but bank profitability has suffered, and some banks are shrinking their loan portfolios to meet capital requirements.
9. Exposure to Greece is a near-term risk. Greek bank subsidiaries have made considerable progress in re-aligning lending with their domestic deposit base and increasing capital (Box 1). However, economic distress in Greece could adversely affect parents’ ability to inject new capital in their Albanian subsidiaries, if needed. To address possible risks, the Bank of Albania (BoA) has applied more stringent capital and liquidity requirements on Greek banks, and heightened coordination with Greek authorities.

[…]

REPORT ON THE DISCUSSIONS

C. Maintaining Financial Stability in the Face of Continued Challenges
Background
21. Eurozone spillover risks are a concern, but significant actions have been taken. The preponderance of foreign subsidiaries in Albania and banking troubles in Europe raise the specter of potential spillovers to the country’s banking system. However, the low reliance on external funding and greater dependence on local deposits prior to the crisis (the loan-to-deposit ratio of the Albanian banking system has remained below 65 percent in the past decade) has helped to mitigate the risks. Also, regulatory changes introduced in late 2011 have helped to protect against possible contagion effects, particularly related to Greece (Box 1 and Figure 4).8
22. Asset quality deterioration has both cyclical and structural reasons. The increase in NPLs is explained by the economic slowdown, which has been exacerbated, in part, by the increase in the government’s nonpayment of supplier’s bills. In addition, banks’ efforts to resolve problem loans have been hindered by an inefficient collateral execution process, including lengthy legal procedures, weak judicial enforcement of creditors’ rights and a regulated floor on real estate prices at auctions, which hinders foreclosure sales. Banks appear to be relatively well-provisioned against NPLs, but not surprisingly, the increase in NPLs has adversely affected both their profitability and their ability to extend credit. If NPLs continue to rise, some nonsystemic banks may need to bolster capital or shed assets. Given that the system is dominated by European subsidiaries, it may be ambitious to expect parents to fully satisfy additional capital needs, if necessary.
Staff advice
Strictly monitor capital and liquidity. Supervisors should be vigilant to ensure that banks continue to proactively recognize and provision against nonperforming loans and, based on stress test results, ensure that capital and liquidity levels provide appropriate buffers. Close coordination with other national regulators about evolving challenges, including regional deleveraging, should also continue. Following up on the considerable progress made in recent years with Fund technical assistance, the priority should be to develop contingency plans for individual banks, and develop simulations to test the authorities’ preparedness. Staff encouraged the authorities to request an update on the 2005 FSAP.
Intensify efforts to arrest the deterioration in asset quality. Concrete actions to ease collateral execution, reduce delays in the legal process, and clear unpaid government bills and VAT refunds are essential. In particular, allowing property prices to adjust to market forces by removing the regulated price floor at auctions would help facilitate foreclosures sales,9 while backloading the fees paid to bailiff offices would create greater incentives for timely execution. Implementation of the guidelines on loan restructuring, recently issued by the BoA (and prepared in cooperation with the World Bank), should also encourage increased out-of-court workouts of nonperforming loans.
Authorities’ views
23. The authorities concurred that the near term priority is to contain possible Eurozone spillovers. They viewed continued close bank supervision and cooperation with regional regulatory authorities as having been critical in containing risks so far and planned to further strengthen these efforts. They also indicated a readiness to reinforce the regulatory framework and contingency plans, guided by stress test results. They plan to request an FSAP update for late 2013.
24. Reducing NPLs is a priority. There was broad agreement about the causes of rising NPLs and the need to reduce their level. At the same time, the authorities noted that with adequate capitalization, the increase in NPLs had been rather manageable so far, and even if it were to increase further, only a handful of nonsystemic banks would fall below regulatory capital requirements. The authorities were also confident about the ability of parent banks to bring in additional capital, if needed. Instead, they expressed concern about the tendency of European banks to ascribe high risk weights to Albanian government securities. They saw scope for more aggressive execution of collateral but also underscored the social sensitivities associated with rapid foreclosure sales.

[…]

Source:

Mark Pleas
Eastern Europe Banking & Deposits Consultant