Saturday, August 31, 2013

Russia – Banks publish consolidated results for 1H 2013, mostly disappointing: Alfa-Bank reports net profit of € 443 mln (-15.3% from year earlier), Gazprombank net profit of € 269 mln (+24.4%), Rosbank net profit of € 113 mln (-30.2%), Promsvyazbank net profit of € 105 mln (+17.9%), Investbank net profit of € 0.9 mln (-94.5%), while MDM, Orient Express, Russian Standard, and Petrocommerce all post losses

  

On 29-30 August 2013 a number of Russian banking groups issued consolidated IFRS financial statements for the first half of 2013.  The consolidated results published for 1H 2013 are given below.  (N.B.: As of 30 June 2013 official exchange rates were EUR 1 = RUB 42.718 and USD 1 = RUB 32.709.)


Alfa-Bank (ОАО «АЛЬФА-БАНК»), Russia’s 7th largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net profit of RUB 18,913,956,000 (€ 442.8 mln, USD 578.2 mln), down 15.3% from the net profit of RUB 22,317,142,000 achieved in the year-earlier period.

Gazprombank («Газпромбанк» (ОАО)), Russia’s 3rd largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net profit of RUB 11,473,000,000, up 24.4% from the net profit of RUB 9,221,000,000 achieved in the year-earlier period.

Rosbank (АКБ «РОСБАНК» (ОАО)), Russia’s 10th largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net profit of RUB 4,821,000,000, down 30.2% from the net profit of RUB ­­­­­­­­­­­­6,903,000,000 achieved in the year-earlier period.

Promsvyazbank (ОАО «Промсвязьбанк»), Russia’s 9th largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net profit of RUB 4,465,055,000, up 17.9% from the net profit of RUB 3,769,375,000 achieved in the year-earlier period.

Investbank (АКБ «Инвестбанк» (ОАО)), Russia’s 78th largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net profit of RUB 37,086,000, down 94.5% from the net profit of RUB 672,078,000 achieved in the year-earlier period.

MDM Bank (ОАО «МДМ Банк»), Russia’s 21st largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net loss of RUB 177,000,000, an improvement from the net loss of RUB ­­­­­­­­­­­­634,000,000 registered in the year-earlier period.

Orient Express Bank (ОАО «Восточный экспресс банк»), Russia’s 30th largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net loss of RUB 364,536,000, compared to a net profit of RUB ­­­­­­­­­­­­2,829,838,000 achieved in the year-earlier period.

Russian Standard Bank (ЗАО «Банк Русский Стандарт»), Russia’s 18th largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net loss of RUB 643,000,000, compared to a net profit of RUB ­­­­­­­­­­­­2,535,000,000 achieved in the year-earlier period.

Bank Petrocommerce (ОАО КБ «Петрокоммерц»), Russia’s 27th largest commercial bank by assets as of 30 June, reported for the first half of 2013 a consolidated net loss of RUB 1,581,801,000, compared to a net profit of RUB ­­­­­­­­­­­­706,060,000 achieved in the year-earlier period.


Totaling the figures above, it is evident that the combined net consolidated profit in 1H 2013 for the nine banks listed above was RUB 36,943,760,000, down 23.5% from the figure of RUB 48,319,493,000 for these same banks a year earlier, in 1H 2012.


Sources:
Ranking of Russian banks by assets: Рэнкинги банков



Thursday, August 29, 2013

Transnistria – Incontrovertible evidence that central bankers are secretly cleaning up in Eastern Europe




On 26 August 2013 the press office of Transnistria’s central bank, the Trans-Dniester Republican Bank (Приднестровский Республиканский Банк - ПРБ), published photographs of central bank staff members cleaning up leaves, twigs, and rubbish in the park adjacent to the bank and in another park in central Tiraspol during a subbotnik (субботник) held on 23 August.






Source:




Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Poland – UniCredit’s subsidiary Pekao reportedly interested in acquiring 10th-ranked bank BGŻ from Dutch parent Rabobank; Survey shows banks have loosened lending requirements since revision of Recommendation T; Polish experts propose roadmap for breakup of eurozone as the best way to save southern nations and France


On 7 August 2013 the Polish financial website Parkiet reported that Bank Pekao (Bank Polska Kasa Opieki SA), a Polish subsidiary of Italy’s UniCredit S.p.A., is interested in buying BGŻ (Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej SA), a Polish subsidiary of the Rabobank Group of Utrecht, Netherlands, a leading bank in the food and agricultural sector worldwide.

Parkiet reported that the president of Bank Pekao, Luigi Lovaglio, had obtained authorization from UniCredit to submit a bid to Rabobank for the purchase of BGŻ.  The report estimated the value of the deal at PLN 7-8 bln (€ 1.7-1.9 bln), but stated that the Italians had deliberately submitted a bid that was low.  (At the time of writing EUR 1 = PLN 4.1994 and USD 1 = 3.1643.)

Earlier, on 20 December 2012 Rabobank had indicated that by mid-2016 it intended to reduce its holdings in BGŻ.  Specifically, it announced that having recently succeeded in raising its stake in BGŻ from 60% to more than 98%, its intention was to merge the bank with Rabobank’s preexisting wholly-owned Polish subsidiary, Rabobank Polska S.A., with Rabobank Polska being absorbed by BGŻ “before the end of 2013 and no later than mid 2014”.  After that merger, Rabobank intended to reduce its holdings of the resulting bank to 75% by increasing the free float of BGŻ shares on the Warsaw Stock Exchange to at least 25% by no later than mid-2016.

On 12 May 2013 the newssite Rzeczpospolita reported that Rabobank was looking to “sell” BGŻ – apparently its entire interest in the bank – and was canvassing among the larger Polish banks for potential interest.

On 28 June 2013 Parkiet reported that Rabobank was evaluating its options for selling the bank, and that four Polish banks were interested in acquiring BGŻ: ING Bank Śląski S.A., BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A., Credit Agicole Bank Polska S.A., and Getin Noble Bank S.A.

The 7 August report by Parkiet therefore adds a fifth bank to the list of Polish banks reportedly interested in acquiring BGŻ from its Dutch parent.

Background data – BGŻ

On 14 August 2013 the management of BGŻ published audited, consolidated financial statements for 1H 2013.  As of 30 June 2013 the key data consolidated data* were as follows (EUR 1 = PLN 4.3292):

Total assets: PLN 36,702.0 mln (€ 8.478 bln)
Total loans: PLN 25,968.8 mln (€ 5.999 bln)
Total deposits: PLN 26,677.9 mln (€ 6.162 bln)

Ratio of impaired loans to total loans: 7.93%
Coverage ratio for impaired loans: 49.58%
Share capital: PLN 51.1 mln (€ 11.8 mln)

Number of branches: 402
Number of ATMs: 425
Number of employees: 5,710

*Besides the bank itself, the consolidated data include a 100%-owned real-estate subsidiary (Bankowy Fundusz Nieruchomościowy Actus Sp. z o.o.) and a 49%-owned leasing subsidiary (BGŻ Leasing Sp. z o.o.).

At end-2012 BGŻ ranked as the 10th largest commercial bank in Poland by assets, with total assets of PLN 37.25 bln (€ 9.11 bln)

At the time of writing the market capitalization of the bank is calculated at PLN 3.293 bln (€ 772 mln) and its book value at PLN 3.475 bln (€ 827 mln).


Quarterly financial results for Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej (BGŻ),
2010-2013 (in PLN)


Quarter
Net interest income
for quarter
Net fee and commission income
for quarter
Net profit/loss
for quarter
1Q 2010
127,199,000
62,919,000
9,677,000
2Q 2010
146,015,000
68,820,000
13,618,000
3Q 2010
159,330,000
70,345,000
23,009,000
4Q 2010
171,774,000
69,443,000
66,037,000
1Q 2011
171,140,000
64,061,000
33,829,000
2Q 2011
198,639,000
68,191,000
26,453,000
3Q 2011
228,440,0oo
69,251,000
40,600,000
4Q 2011
235,792,000
68,394,000
27,215,000
1Q 2012
244,805,000
70,609,000
40,479,000
2Q 2012
257,456,000
77,573,000
-1,023,000
3Q 2012
262,571,000
77,308,000
38,202,000
4Q 2012
256,535,000
70,687,000
52,391,000
1Q 2013
239,035,000
69,329,000
29,544,000
2Q 2013
242,537,000
60,771,000
52,988,000


As of 28 June 2013, BGŻ was owned 98.50% by the Rabobank Group: 8.41% by Rabobank Nederland (Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A.) and 90.09% by its wholly owned subsidiary Rabobank International Holding B.V.

Rabobank originally acquired a 35.3% interest in BGŻ in late 2004 for approximately € 150 mln in coordination with an acquisition of a 15% interest in BGŻ by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).  Rabobank raised its interest to 37% in 2006, to 46.05% in 2007, and to 59.35% in April 2008 through the acquisition of the 12.87% interest still owned at that time by EBRD.  In mid-2012 the Dutch bank carried out a tender offer for outstanding shares of BGŻ, so that at end-2012 the Rabobank Group’s shareholdings in BGŻ had reached 98.26%.


Background data – Bank Pekao

On 6 August 2013 the management of Bank Pekao published audited, condensed consolidated financial statements for the Bank Pekao Group for 1H 2013.  As of 30 June 2013 the key data consolidated data* were as follows (EUR 1 = PLN 4.3292):

Total assets: PLN 150,784.6 mln (€ 34.830 bln)
Total loans: PLN 97,043.6 mln (€ 22.416 bln)
Total deposits: PLN 108,964.4 mln (€ 25.170 bln)

Ratio of impaired receivables to total receivables: 7.5%
Share capital: PLN 262.5 mln (€ 60.63 mln)

Number of outlets (Bank Pekao + PJSC UniCredit Bank in Ukraine): 1,040
Number of ATMs (Bank Pekao + PJSC UniCredit Bank in Ukraine): 1,907
Number of employees: 19,515

*Besides the bank itself, the consolidated data include 18 subsidiaries consolidated under the full method (podmioty konsolidowane metodą pełną) and 5 consolidated under the equity method (podmioty wyceniane metodą praw własności).

At end-2012 Bank Pekao ranked as the 2nd largest commercial bank in Polish assets, with total assets of PLN 151.0 bln (€ 36.9 bln), well behind the front runner, PKO Bank Polski, which had total assets of PLN 193.5 bln.


In earlier news, on 16 July 2013 Bank Pekao sold a 100% stake in its principal subsidiary, the Ukrainian commercial bank PJSC UniCredit Bank (ПАТ «УніКредит Банк»), to the parent bank in Italy, UniCredit S.p.A.  The price for the sale was USD 166.35 mln “plus the amount, after certification by external auditor, of cumulative consolidated net profit of the period from October 1, 2010 to July 16, 2013.”  The CEO of PJSC UniCredit Bank in Kiev, Federico Russo, stated in a press release that by yearend UniCredit plans to merge PJSC UniCredit with another UniCredit subsidiary in Ukraine, the struggling commercial bank Ukrotsbank (ПАТ «Укрсоцбанк»).

Earlier still, on 31 January the Italian parent bank, UniCredit S.p.A. of Rome, sold on the Warsaw Stock Exchange 23,936,267 of the 155,433,755 shares that it held in Bank Pekao, reducing UniCredit’s stake in the bank from 59.22% to 50.10%.  As of 30 June 2013, the second-largest shareholder in Bank Pekao was Aberdeen Asset Management PLC of Aberdeen, Scotland, which held a 5.03% stake in the bank.  (As of 31 July 2013, Aberdeen Asset Management also owned shares in Akbank (Turkey), Garanti Bank (Turkey), Bank of Philippine Islands (Philippines), Siam Commercial Bank (Thailand), Public Bank (Malaysia), ICICI Bank (India), Banco Santander-Chile (Chile), and Banco Bradesco (Brazil).)


Principal sources:
Rabobank press release: Rabobank: result of Tender Offer almost 100% stake in BGZ (2012-07-31)
BGŻ IPO of May 2011 – Overview and links to documents: Oferta publiczna akcji serii A i akcji serii D Banku Gospodarki Żywnościowej S.A.
BGŻ IPO of May 2011 – Prospectus: Prospekt emisyjny (2011-04-29)
Rabobank Group: Consolidated Financial Statements 2011 (2012-03-29)
Rabobank Group: Consolidated Financial Statements 2010 (2011-04-08)
Rabobank Group: Consolidated Financial Statements 2008 (2009-03-31)
Rabobank Group: Annual Report 2007 (2008-04-15)
Rabobank Group: Consolidated Financial Statements 2006 (2007-04-04)
Rabobank Group: Annual Report 2004 (2005-05-25)
BGŻ – Financial statements for 1H 2013: 14 sierpnia – Wyniki finansowe Banku BGŻ za I półrocze 2013 r. (2013-08-14)
BGŻ press release – Results for 1H 2013: Komunikat prasowy: Bank BGŻ - poprawa wyniku po pierwszym półroczu 2013 roku (2013-08-14)
Market cap and book value of BGŻ: Informacje podstawowe (2013-08-14)
Largest banks in Poland at end-2012: Największe banki w Polsce w 2012 roku (2013-06-24 09:36)




In other news, on 5 August 2013 the National Bank of Poland (Narodowy Bank Polski – NBP) published its latest quarterly opinion survey of banks’ senior loan officers.  The NBP describes the overlying methodology as follows: “The survey is addressed to the chairpersons of banks’ credit committees. Banks’ responses may not take account of the opinions of banks’ divisions other than the credit divisions. The survey was conducted at the turn of June and July 2013 among 27 banks with a total share of 81% in claims on enterprises and households in the banking sector’s portfolio.”

The NBP summarizes the most significant results of this latest survey as follows:


Summary of the survey results

Corporate loans
·      Lending policy: a slight tightening of lending standards for long-term loans; higher collateral requirements and an increase in spreads on riskier loans; the extension of maximum loan maturity and lowering of non-interest loan costs.
·         Demand for loans: a slight rise in demand for short-term loans to large enterprises.
·        Expectations for the third quarter of 2013: no change in lending policy; a slight increase in demand for loans to large enterprises.
Housing loans
·        Lending policy: a slight easing of lending standards; an increase in spreads.
·         Demand for loans: a rise in loan demand.
·        Expectations for the third quarter of 2013: a slight easing of lending policy and a slight rise in loan demand.
Consumer loans
·        Lending policy: a significant easing of lending standards; an increase in maximum size of loan, a decrease in spreads, extending of maximum loan maturity.
·         Demand for loans: a significant increase in loan demand.
·       Expectations for the third quarter of 2013: a significant easing of lending policy and growth in loan demand.
The survey responding banks eased, for the first time in four quarters, some of their lending terms in the segment of corporate loans. In their opinion, this change was driven, inter alia, by the activation of the government programme of De Minimis portfolio guarantee facility. At the same time, there was a decline in the percentage of the banks that identified elevated risk associated with future developments in the economy and industry-specific risk. Changes in credit standards and lower financing needs for investment had an adverse impact on loan demand. The banks considered payment backlogs and extended payment periods as loan demand-driving factors.
For another quarter in succession, the banks reported a rise in spreads on housing loans. Despite the move, the demand for housing loans rose, which was attributed by the banks to a reduction in the availability of this type of credit at other banks and to active selling and marketing practices.
The banks substantially eased their lending policies in the segment of consumer loans, which was primarily related to the implementation of an amended Recommendation T. According to the banks, an easing of standards and terms on consumer loans helped to increase demand for this type of funding.


NBP video presentation of credit survey results

Sources:
NBP analysis of survey – Polish: Polityka kredytowa banków (2013-08-05)
NBP analysis of survey – English: Banks’ lending policy (2013-08-05)
Full survey results and analysis – Polish: Sytuacja na rynku kredytowym, III kwartał 2013 r. (2013-07-22)
NBP video presentation of credit survey results: Sytuacja na rynku kredytowym (2013-08-05)



Stefan Kawalec

Ernest Pytlarczyk, Ph.D.

Earlier, in mid-July 2013 the NBP published its Working Paper No. 155: “Controlled dismantlement of the Eurozone: A proposal for a New European Monetary System and a new role for the European Central Bank”, by Stefan Kawalec and Ernest Pytlarczyk.  In contrast to the usual fare offered by central banks, written by staff research economists, this paper was penned by two people in the private sector: “Stefan Kawalec is President of Capital Strategy Sp. z o. o. (a strategy consulting company). He is a former vice-minister of finance in Poland (skawalec@capitalstrategy.pl). Ernest Pytlarczyk is Chief Economist of BRE Bank S.A. (A Commerzbank subsidiary and the fourth largest commercial bank in Poland) (ernest.pytlarczy@brebank.pl).”

The authors summarize the situation of the eurozone as follows:
Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Italy are trapped in recession and cannot restore their competitiveness by devaluating their currencies. On the other hand, the northern Eurozone countries have to participate in endless bail-outs and have been forced to disregard their values of prudent financial policies. This situation has created a vicious circle of resentment and populism in the southern countries and a revival of nationalistic tendencies in the northern countries, which may ultimately tear Europe apart.

To the above description they append the following in a footnote:
Sinn (2013) gave the following summary of the current Eurozone plight: “Crunch time is fast approaching. Cyprus is almost out of the euro, its banks’ collapse having been delayed by the European Central Bank’s provision of Emergency Liquidity Assistance, while euroskeptic parties led by Beppe Grillo and Silvio Berlusconi garnered a combined total of 55% of the popular vote in the latest Italian general election. Moreover, the Greeks and Spaniards are unlikely to be able to bear the strain of economic austerity much longer, with youth unemployment inching toward 60%. The independence movement in Catalonia has gathered so much momentum that a leading Spanish general has vowed to send troops into Barcelona should the province hold a referendum on secession. France, too, has competitiveness problems, and is unable to meet its commitments under the European Union’s Fiscal Compact. Portugal needs a new rescue program, and Slovenia could soon be asking for a rescue as well.”
Beylin (2013) advises that in crisis-ridden Portugal, 87% people are dissatisfied with the democratic regime, and nearly half of the population positively assess the dictatorship which was overthrown in 1970s (according to an opinion poll in late 2012). “Across Europe, nostalgia for a strong order and powerful leaders proliferates, while the memory of misfortunes caused by dictatorships pales,” he writes.

The abstract for the paper is reproduced below verbatim:

ABSTRACT

In Kawalec and Pytlarczyk (2013), we argue that the single European currency constitutes a serious threat to the European Union and the Single European Market, and we propose a controlled dismantlement of the Eurozone. In this paper, we undertake a deeper analysis of the measures which would minimize the risks throughout the process of the Eurozone dismantlement and contribute to rebuilding confidence in the future of Europe.
·        The dismantlement should be the result of a consensual decision to replace the euro with an alternative system of currency coordination.
·        The dismantlement should start with the exit of the most competitive countries. In the meantime, the euro should remain the common currency of less competitive countries.
·        The European Central Bank (ECB) should be preserved as the central bank for all 17 Eurozone member countries, even after some of those countries have replaced the euro with new currencies. In this capacity, the ECB should be in charge of designing, preparing, and implementing the segmentation of the Eurozone as well as managing the new currency coordination system – European Monetary System 2.
·        The forthcoming EU – USA free trade agreement would build new momentum for economic growth and contribute to restoring confidence in the future of Europe.
As of today, neither the member states of the Eurozone nor European institutions such as the European Commission or the ECB have been able to come up with a game-changing proposal such as the Eurozone dismantlement. However, this may change as a result of adverse economic and political developments. One of the potential triggers could be the situation in France.


The paper is available only in English, but the same content was covered by the two authors in a seminar held at the NBP on 28 June 2013, “Kontrolowana dekompozycja strefy euro. Propozycja nowego Europejskiego Systemu Walutowego i nowej roli dla Europejskiego Banku Centralnego”, the slides for which are available at the website of the NBP.

Sources: