Monday, February 11, 2013

Lithuania – Šiaulių bankas reports profit of € 4 mln for 2012 while it shifts assets from loans to securities, IMF concludes that Lithuania’s banking system is “profitable, liquid, and well-capitalized” but that “continued vigilance is needed”


On 11 February 2013 the commercial bank Šiaulių bankas (Šiaulių bankas AB) published unaudited financial statements for 4Q 2012.  (One euro equaled 3.4528 Lithuanian litas (LTL) on 31 Dec. 2012.)

The bank registered a net profit for the year of 14.9 mln LTL (€ 4.31 mln), an increase of 16.1% over the result of 12.8 mln LTL for 2011 and a considerable improvement over the net loss of 24.2 mln LTL registered in 2010.  Total assets at the end of 2012 were 2,931.5 mln LTL (€ 849.0 mln), up 7.5% over the previous year.


Total deposits increased 14.3% during the year, ending the year at 2,165.9 mln LTL (€ 627.3 mln).  But the additional deposits did not end up in loans, since in 2012 the bank’s loan portfolio declined 0.6% to 2,057.7 mln LTL.  Instead the funds ended up in securities, with holdings of trading securities more than tripling in 2012 to end the year at 51.2 mln LTL, and investment securities surging by 42% from 335.3 mln LTL to 478.4 mln LTL.  Among investment securities, held-to-maturity securities decreased 10.0% during the year, from 303.3 mln LTL to 273.0 mln LTL, while the level of available-for-sale securities exploded from 32.1 mln LTL to 205.4 mln LTL, presumably indicating a reclassification by the bank of some securities from “held to maturity” to “available for sale” status.

The largest shareholders of Šiaulių bankas are as follows:

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD): 19.57%
Mr. Gintaras Kateiva (member of the bank’s Supervisory Council): 6.24%
Clients of the Swedish bank Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ): 5.53%
AB „ Eglės“ sanatorija: 5.37%
Mr. Algirdas Butkus (chairman of the bank’s Board): 4.39%

Sources:


In other news, on 11 February a mission from the International Monetary Fund concluded a visit to Lithuania and issued a concluding statement in Vilnius.  Below is reproduced verbatim the section of the statement that deals with the banking system.  (Emphasis as per original.)

Strengthening the financial sector to support growth

Overall, the banking system is profitable, liquid, and well-capitalized, but continued vigilance is needed. The system-wide capital adequacy ratio is nearly 15 percent and liquid assets are about 25 percent of total assets. However, non-performing loans (NPLs)—while declining—remain high and profitability is falling. The intervention of Snoras bank removed a major threat to financial stability, and the recent steps to rapidly address problems in two troubled credit unions underscore the importance of effective financial sector supervision. In this context, the Bank of Lithuania’s (BoL) stepped-up onsite inspections, strict stress testing, and careful monitoring of banks’ loan loss provisions are essential for the continued health of the banking system. The BoL should continue to safeguard financial stability, including by requiring banks to raise capital as needed. Ongoing efforts to strengthen the supervision of credit institutions are welcome.

The financial sector has an essential role to play in supporting a robust and sustainable recovery. While Lithuania has so far been able to continue its economic recovery despite negative private sector credit growth for nearly four years, it is important that credit is not unduly constrained going forward. The weak economic environment and uncertainty about growth prospects both in Lithuania and abroad have no doubt hampered demand for credit by firms and households. At the same time, lending standards have been tight, partly reflecting continued risk aversion of the part of banks, lingering NPLs, and scarcer parent bank funding. NPLs appear to take a longer time to work out in Lithuania than in some regional peers, and a review of obstacles to timely NPL resolution should be considered. In this regard, the new household insolvency regime and recent proposals to modify the corporate insolvency regime are welcome.

Source:


Mark Pleas
Eastern Europe Banking & Deposits Consultant